Friday, September 25, 2009

Time for the Government to get Creative

The US government is talking about a “jobless recovery” like it’s something that exists. A jobless recovery -- where the price of everything goes up -- from stock price to home prices to the price of bread in the store is not a recovery. It’s inflation. The value of the dollar is not up. It’s down -- consistent with inflation, not recovery.

With the unemployment numbers so high, 13 states are going to the federal government to ask that unemployment benefits be extended. Obviously for the families who need income to survive, this request is necessary and seems to be the best short-term solution.

But the government cannot keep funding a jobless recovery by creating government jobs and extending benefits. It’s time for them to get creative about driving a jobs generation campaign.

Companies that stay in business for more than three years, and which in that time grow their business year-over-year have a significantly improved chance of lasting long-term. I would like to see the US government enact a creative tax ladder for new businesses whereby they would only pay half the taxes due in year one; if their net revenue has increased in year two, they only pay half their taxes in year two. And if by year three, their net revenue has grown year-over-year against year two, and they have hired at least one additional person full-time, they would owe their full taxes in year three but receive a write-off equal to the other half of their year-one taxes.

Essentially, under this plan, new businesses would receive a new business tax discount equal to the taxes they would have paid in year one and half of year two, but by year three they would pay full taxes and have created a minimum of two jobs. And to qualify, they would have had to generate an increase in net revenue year-over-year for three years, so the taxes owed in year three would be more than years one or two.

Do you have a creative idea for the US government to create more private sector jobs, or do you think it’s better to just keep expanding government and extending benefits until there are more people requiring help than those left employed to help?

Please share your thoughts! Follow us on Twitter @Job_Security

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

While I like your attitude and enthusiasm I think the solution is much simpler. I think we need an across the board tax cut. Not a graduated tax cut but a flat tax cut. These "Fat Cats" that keep getting gouged to pick up a larger and larger share for the great unwashed masses that do not pay any taxes need to get a tax break in order to be able to hire one of the unemployed so they can start paying their own taxes. The net will actually be greater. Ronald Reagan proved this.
If you really want a stimulus and not just a bailout, then what needs to happen is an immediate freeze on income taxes for everyone through July of 2010. That much extra $$$ being pumped into the system is easy, effecient and woudl stimulate a ton of growth. That growth would fuel the economy with the tax revenues of the second half of 2010. To say that there is not enough money is ridiculous. It is not stopping congress form writing the check they currently are. BTW, those checks are being written feom my grade school children's checking account that they have not even established yet......